Prince Mario-Max Schaumburg-Lippe: One Positron, Held for Months, Opens a New Test of the Universe

One particle. Months of patience. And a question underneath it all that is almost as old as cosmology: why is there something, rather than an equal mix of something and its opposite?

A team at Northwestern University, led by physicist Gerald Gabrielse, has captured a single positron – the antimatter twin of the electron – and held it, alone, for months. They cooled it to its lowest quantum energy state and watched it make individual quantum jumps, one at a time. The work, published October 21 in Physical Review Letters, creates what the team calls a one-positron quantum cyclotron. It is a first, and it sets up one of the most precise comparisons physics knows how to make.

Holding something that must not touch anything

Here is the problem in one sentence. A positron that touches ordinary matter meets an electron, and both vanish in a flash of energy. So you cannot put one in a jar. You cannot rest it on a shelf. The Northwestern trap has no walls that matter – the positron hangs in a near-perfect vacuum, held in place by carefully shaped electric and magnetic fields in a device known as a Penning trap.

Getting one in there is slow, fiddly work. The positrons start in the radioactive decay of sodium-22, arriving with energies as high as 546 kilo-electron-volts. The team sends them through a tungsten crystal to slow them down. Many are lost. The slowest survivors briefly pair with an electron to form neutral positronium, drift through an opening just 625 micrometers wide, and then the trap’s electric field pulls the pair apart and keeps the positron. At the moment, loading a single positron takes about 8 to 11 hours.

Then the cold. The apparatus runs at 300 millikelvin – three tenths of a degree above absolute zero. “We cool it down so much that it’s in its quantum ground state,” Gabrielse said. “We actually coaxed this very fast positron to sit there and behave for months at a time.”

An artificial atom you can tune

Once settled, the trapped positron behaves like a tiny artificial atom. Its energy comes in steps, like rungs on a ladder, and the team showed it can climb those steps on command. Tuned microwave pulses add precise amounts of energy. They flipped the particle’s spin. And they detected each change through small shifts in the frequency at which the positron moves – shifts so telling that they also confirm only one positron is in the trap.

That level of control is the real prize. Control is what turns a curiosity into an instrument. Readers who followed the Chandra gallery of sixteen glowing galaxies will recognize the pattern from the other end of the size scale. Whether the subject is a galaxy or a single particle, progress often looks like this – a better way to hold still and look carefully.

The comparison everyone is waiting for

The goal now comes into focus. In earlier work, Gabrielse’s group used a one-electron quantum cyclotron to measure the electron’s magnetic moment to about one part in 10 trillion. That is among the most precise measurements ever made of any elementary particle property. Do the same for the positron, on the same footing, and you can compare matter and antimatter directly.

The Standard Model of physics predicts the two should be perfect mirror images – a principle called CPT symmetry. The team is careful about what this paper does and does not show. It demonstrates the trapping and the quantum control. The finished precision measurement comes next. But the authors say a positron measurement matching the electron’s precision now looks feasible, testing CPT symmetry in the lepton sector more than 30 times more precisely than has been possible before.

Why a mismatch would matter so much

The Big Bang should, on the standard account, have made matter and antimatter in equal amounts. Equal amounts cancel. A universe built that way ends as light and very little else. Yet here we are – galaxies, oceans, readers – made entirely of the leftover matter. Something tipped the balance, and nobody yet knows what.

A difference between the electron and positron magnetic moments would be a clue of the first rank. “Current theories suggest that there will be no difference in the two measurements,” Gabrielse said. “If it turns out they are not equal, that would be the biggest discovery in physics in the last century.” And if they are equal? That result helps too. It tightens one of the most demanding tests in science and tells theorists to look elsewhere, with better maps.

There is a pleasing echo in this week’s science coverage. Our story on bleached coral recovering in seven weeks after a brief touch from healthy coral was also, at bottom, about patience and close observation paying off. Different lab, different ocean, same virtue.

What happens next

Next steps are practical. Load positrons faster than one per working day. Hold the systematics – the small errors that creep into any measurement this fine – down at the level the electron result achieved. Then make the measurement and put the two numbers side by side. The paper, by first author T. G. Myers and colleagues, appeared as “One-Positron Quantum Cyclotron” in Physical Review Letters 137, 173001, with support from the National Science Foundation.

For now, picture the scene in Evanston. In a cold, quiet vacuum, a single speck of antimatter circles in its field-made cage, month after month, behaving beautifully. It weighs almost nothing. It may end up answering one of the heaviest questions there is – why the universe kept its matter, and let the rest of us happen.

Also published on: